CSG Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee Newsletter
August 12, 2008
In This Issue
WIPP
Yucca Cost
Key Issues
GNEP
Quick Links
Midwest Planning Guide

In Our Next Issue
Transuranic waste shipments from Argonne really DO resume, Rev. 3 of the Planning Guide, and more!
 Join Our List
Join Our Mailing List
The Council of State Governments - Midwestern Office


Welcome to CSG's Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee Newsletter.  In each edition, we strive to bring to our readers' attention the latest happenings in the world of radioactive waste transportation, including committee activities, developments related to the U.S. Department of Energy's radioactive waste shipments, or news of the nuclear renaissance.  Anyone with ideas for future articles or with questions about the newsletter should contact Lisa Janairo at 920/458-5910 or ljanairo@csg.org.

RH-72B Problem with Drum Punctures Plan to Resume Argonne Shipments
It was almost a go.  But DOE's hope of resuming shipments of transuranic waste from Argonne National Laboratory near Chicago skidded to a halt last week because of a punctured drum.  The drum didn't contain remote-handled transuranic waste from Argonne, but rather contact-handled waste from Los Alamos National Laboratory.  The drum had already been emplaced underground at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant and was being checked one last time.  While filling out the final paperwork, a technician noticed a puncture in one drum in a pack of seven.  DOE evacuated the underground at WIPP while workers took samples to determine whether radiation had leaked from the drum.  Fortunately, no radiation was detected. 

As a result of the incident, DOE implemented a "safety pause" during which workers at WIPP are reviewing the incident and examining operating procedures.  DOE is also conducting an investigation of the incident, which is the first of its kind at WIPP.  As a result of the safety pause, the transfer of an empty RH 72B container (shown above) to Argonne was delayed, therefore loading could not take place in time for the first shipment scheduled for August 7.  Instead, the first shipment will take place this week, with two trucks departing WIPP rather than just one as previously planned.

To read about the punctured drum and DOE's response, click here.

In other WIPP-related news, on July 31, the Midwestern states held a teleconference with their colleagues in the Northeast to identify potential routes for transuranic waste shipments from DOE's so-called "small quantity sites" in New York and Pennsylvania.  These shipments will head to Idaho starting a few years from now.  The interregional discussions will continue later this month as the Midwest works with the states in the South to evaluate potential routes from three small quantity sites in Tennessee, Virginia, and Kentucky. 


price tag A Billion Here, a Billion There...
On August 5, DOE released its revised estimate of the total system life-cycle cost for building and operating a repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.  The new estimate of $96.2 billion represents a jump of 38% over the 2001 estimate of $57.5 billion.  One reason for the increase is that DOE assumed 30% more commercial spent fuel would go into Yucca Mountain, for a total waste inventory of 122,100 metric tons of heavy metal.  (An act of Congress would be required to lift the current cap of 70,000 metric tons of heavy metal.)  The cost of raw materials, changes to the repository design, and inflation also affected the final estimate. 

The total estimated cost of the transportation program comes to $19.5 billion.  By comparison, the cost of the Midwest's cooperative agreement from its inception in 1989 through the first 10 years of shipments (assuming full funding in future years) would come to approximately 0.04% -- that's four one-hundredths of a percent -- of the total transportation cost, or just 0.008% of the grand total.  Even if multiplied by four to account for all the regions, the cost of good working relationships with the states appears to be a real bargain!

To read DOE's press release, click here.
To read the full report, click here.


magnifying glass Key Issues
The Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee finalized its list of key issues related to DOE's Yucca Mountain project, run by the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM).  The committee will focus its activities on these issues over the next two years.  Notable changes to the list include the addition of three new issues:  OCRWM's transportation plan, the transportation implications of storage solutions, and pre-emption of state laws.  The committee also added the establishment of a uniform rail inspection process to its list of priority issues.

Committee members expressed general satisfaction with the current status of Section 180(c) implementation, OCRWM's commitment to a regional planning process, and the prospects of resolving weather-related issues pertaining to shipments on a case-by-case basis.  These issues will stand as open issues to be monitored in the coming year.

Moving into the "closed" category is the issue of barge shipments on the Great Lakes.  The change does not reflect a reversal in the committee's previous position in opposition to such shipments.  Instead, the states agreed to close this issue because of the strong likelihood that DOE will choose other options for shipping from sites in Michigan and Wisconsin that currently do not have rail access.  

To view the key issues, click here.


GNEP2 GNEP Scales Back
On July 10, DOE eliminated all siting activities related to its Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, or GNEP.  Two sites in Illinois and one in Ohio had previously been under consideration. The department acted as a result of over 14,000 comments received during the scoping process for the programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) on the GNEP program.  In addition to halting all siting activities, DOE will modify its plans for the PEIS to consider other alternative open and closed fuel cycles.  At issue is whether the U.S. should embark on a reprocessing, or recycling, program for spent nuclear fuel or just dispose of it in a national repository. 

DOE intends to issue a draft PEIS on GNEP this month, followed by public hearings.  The sites formerly considered for GNEP facilities may, indeed, be looked at in the future depending on whether DOE decides to pursue reprocessing.  Consideration of any sites would be the subject of a separate environmental impact statement, including public hearings.

Visit DOE's GNEP website to view the announcement.
Read correspondence from Argonne National Laboratory on this topic.
Thanks for reading!  Look for the next edition in three weeks.

Sincerely, 

Lisa R. Janairo
The Council of State Governments - Midwestern Office

The Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Project is supported by cooperative agreements with the U.S. Department of Energy (#DE-FC30-07CC00031 and DE-FC28-04RW12282). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this newsletter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of DOE.
Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to ljanairo@csg.org by ljanairo@csg.org.
The Council of State Governments - Midwestern Office | 701 E. 22nd Street, Suite 110 | Lombard | IL | 60148