| In Our Next Issue
|
Transuranic waste
shipments from Argonne really DO resume, Rev. 3 of
the Planning Guide, and
more!
|
| Join Our List
|

|
| |
| Welcome to CSG's Midwestern
Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee
Newsletter. In each edition, we strive to
bring to our readers' attention the latest
happenings in the world of radioactive waste
transportation, including committee activities,
developments related to the U.S. Department of
Energy's radioactive waste shipments, or news of
the nuclear renaissance. Anyone with ideas
for future articles or with questions about the
newsletter should contact Lisa Janairo at
920/458-5910 or
ljanairo@csg.org. |
|
|
Problem with Drum
Punctures Plan to Resume Argonne Shipments
It was almost a go. But DOE's hope of
resuming shipments of transuranic waste from
Argonne National Laboratory near Chicago skidded
to a halt last week because of a punctured
drum. The drum didn't contain remote-handled
transuranic waste from Argonne, but rather
contact-handled waste from Los Alamos National
Laboratory. The drum had already been
emplaced underground at the Waste Isolation Pilot
Plant and was being checked one last time.
While filling out the final paperwork, a
technician noticed a puncture in one drum in a
pack of seven. DOE evacuated the underground
at WIPP while workers took samples to determine
whether radiation had leaked from the drum.
Fortunately, no radiation was detected.
As
a result of the incident, DOE implemented a
"safety pause" during which workers at WIPP are
reviewing the incident and examining operating
procedures. DOE is also conducting an
investigation of the incident, which is the first
of its kind at WIPP. As a result of the
safety pause, the transfer of an empty RH 72B
container (shown above) to Argonne was delayed,
therefore loading could not take place in time for
the first shipment scheduled for August 7.
Instead, the first shipment will take place this
week, with two trucks departing WIPP rather than
just one as previously planned. To read
about the punctured drum and DOE's response, click
here. In other WIPP-related
news, on July 31, the Midwestern states held a
teleconference with their colleagues in the
Northeast to identify potential routes for
transuranic waste shipments from DOE's so-called
"small quantity sites" in New York and
Pennsylvania. These shipments will head to
Idaho starting a few years from now. The
interregional discussions will continue later this
month as the Midwest works with the states in the
South to evaluate potential routes from three
small quantity sites in Tennessee, Virginia, and
Kentucky.
|
|
|
A Billion Here, a Billion
There... On August 5, DOE
released its revised estimate of the total system
life-cycle cost for building and operating a
repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. The
new estimate of $96.2 billion represents a jump of
38% over the 2001 estimate of $57.5 billion.
One reason for the increase is that DOE assumed
30% more commercial spent fuel would go into Yucca
Mountain, for a total waste inventory of 122,100
metric tons of heavy metal. (An act of
Congress would be required to lift the current cap
of 70,000 metric tons of heavy metal.) The
cost of raw materials, changes to the repository
design, and inflation also affected the final
estimate.
The total estimated cost
of the transportation program comes to $19.5
billion. By comparison, the cost of the
Midwest's cooperative agreement from its inception
in 1989 through the first 10 years of shipments
(assuming full funding in future years) would come
to approximately 0.04% -- that's four
one-hundredths of a percent -- of the total
transportation cost, or just 0.008% of the grand
total. Even if multiplied by four to account
for all the regions, the cost of good working
relationships with the states appears to be a real
bargain!
To read DOE's press release, click
here. To read the full report,
click here.
|
|
|
Key
Issues The Midwestern
Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee
finalized its list of key issues related to DOE's
Yucca Mountain project, run by the Office of
Civilian Radioactive Waste Management
(OCRWM). The committee will focus its
activities on these issues over the next two
years. Notable changes to the list include
the addition of three new issues: OCRWM's
transportation plan, the transportation
implications of storage solutions, and pre-emption
of state laws. The committee also added the
establishment of a uniform rail inspection process
to its list of priority issues.
Committee
members expressed general satisfaction with the
current status of Section 180(c) implementation,
OCRWM's commitment to a regional planning process,
and the prospects of resolving weather-related
issues pertaining to shipments on a case-by-case
basis. These issues will stand as open
issues to be monitored in the coming
year.
Moving into the "closed" category is
the issue of barge shipments on the Great
Lakes. The change does not reflect a
reversal in the committee's previous position in
opposition to such shipments. Instead, the
states agreed to close this issue because of the
strong likelihood that DOE will choose other
options for shipping from sites in Michigan and
Wisconsin that currently do not have rail
access.
To view the key
issues, click here.
|
|
|
GNEP Scales
Back
On July 10, DOE eliminated all siting
activities related to its Global Nuclear Energy
Partnership, or GNEP. Two sites in Illinois
and one in Ohio had previously been under
consideration. The department acted as a result of
over 14,000 comments received during the scoping
process for the programmatic environmental impact
statement (PEIS) on the GNEP program. In
addition to halting all siting activities, DOE
will modify its plans for the PEIS to consider
other alternative open and closed fuel
cycles. At issue is whether the U.S. should
embark on a reprocessing, or recycling, program
for spent nuclear fuel or just dispose of it in a
national repository. DOE intends to
issue a draft PEIS on GNEP this month, followed by
public hearings. The sites formerly
considered for GNEP facilities may, indeed, be
looked at in the future depending on whether DOE
decides to pursue reprocessing.
Consideration of any sites would be the subject of
a separate environmental impact statement,
including public hearings. Visit DOE's GNEP
website to view the announcement. Read correspondence from Argonne
National Laboratory on this
topic. | |
|
Thanks for reading! Look for the next
edition in three weeks.
Sincerely,
Lisa R. Janairo The Council of State
Governments - Midwestern Office
The Midwestern Radioactive Materials
Transportation Project is supported by cooperative
agreements with the U.S. Department of Energy
(#DE-FC30-07CC00031 and DE-FC28-04RW12282). Any
opinions, findings, conclusions, or
recommendations expressed in this newsletter are
those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the views of
DOE. | | |